Still with the Giants…

I’ve been pondering deeply on all those ideas mentioned in my last post, and the comments which followed it.  New thoughts and quotes continue to arrive from all quarters, backing up and validating the conclusions towards which I’ve been fumbling my way.

If you haven’t already done so, please take a look at the last couple of posts I’ve written.  (You can navigate back with the left-pointing arrow at the end of this or check them here – 1st and here – 2nd.)  They seem to have formed themselves into some kind of trilogy and this won’t make so much sense without its predecessors.

English: Portrait of John Milton in National P...

John Milton, National Portrait Gallery, London (detail) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

A very quick recap:

  • The 17th century poet, John Milton, had told us of the anarchic potentials of untamed ether which, according to his Muse, preceded creation and held ’embrion atoms’.
  • Centuries later, the great Nikola Tesla offered a markedly similar picture. His ‘ponderable atoms’ could be drawn from ether, ‘a tenuous fluid, filling all space’ by way of a spinning motion.
  • Tesla’s contemporary, Max Planck, also concluded that matter, as such, did not exist.  It was drawn into being and maintained ‘only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together’.
Solaris with its two suns.

These Giants paint a very different picture of our Cosmos to the one we have grown up with.  Are our solid, dependable teapots, desks, pets and trees this temporary and transient?  Is the spinning motion of some force drawing them out of the ether, and – should it stop the spinning – depositing them back into that ocean of unformed possibility?  I’m reminded of images from the 1972 film Solaris, in case any of you have seen it, where thoughts from the mind of an individual are drawn into three-dimensional reality from an orange gloop on the surface of a mythical planet.  (Just the images, I hasten to emphasise, before someone tries to engage me in a dialogue on Stansilaw Lem’s philosophy, and not the dreadful George Clooney 2002 remake!) 

That brings me towards the second part of my Giants’ assertions: the idea that an intelligent, enlightened consciousness with sufficient experience is able to create anything from this etheric substance at will;  further, that WE are that consciousness.

So, I kind of promised you an answer, did I not?  An answer to how we can, and do, create our universe (or universes, if you adhere to that theory).  I said the scientists had failed to find this mechanism, because it was in a place they would never look.  I found it lurking in the Milton passage I quoted last time:

… hot, cold, moist, and dry, four champions fierce,
Strive here for mastery, and to battle bring
Their embryon atoms.

At first I glossed over that part, dismissing it as a casual reference to the four elements, perhaps.  Something, though – some hidden but insistent part of my consciousness – invited me to delve deeper.

English: Schematic showing the 4 humors or bod...

English: Schematic showing the 4 humors or body fluids. Schematic based on a picture from the book “The Seventy Great Inventions of the Ancient World by Brian M. Fagan” (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Milton’s champions are not the elements – not in the way they’ve come down to us, at any rate.  They were a reference to what were called the Four Humours or Temperaments.  In modern parlance, these would be personality types.  Should you wish to know more, Wiki will tell you here.  They’d been an integral part of natural philosophy (aka science) since Hippocrates developed what was already an ancient idea into a kind of medical tool kit.  It all hinged on moods, emotions and the behaviours they caused.  Even the cautious Wikipedia acknowledges that these theories could have been around in Ancient Egypt or Mesopotamia.  And where did they get them?  If Edgar Cayce is to be believed, the Atlanteans fleeing their sinking lands brought their knowing (sorry, gnosis) to those shores.  And from whom did they receive it…?

Milton is not using the term in any medical sense.  He is describing the jostling for supremacy between these temperaments or emotions as the ‘harnessed energy’ which propels creation.

Emotion?

Seriously?

No wonder the idea ‘declined in popularity’ (Wikipedia again) as science became rational and empirical.  The last thing any self-respecting scientist wanted was for human feelings to get in the way of logic, mathematics and rigorous testing.  Not until the last century did physicists grudgingly have to admit that the human observer affected things in some way.

Take a look, for example at this rather wonderful little video.  I’d like you to focus your attention on the first few minutes – the bit before the flowers arrive.

(If you are accessing this from a source other than WordPress, you may need to look here for the film:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILSyt_Hhbjg )

Masuru Emoto showed us not only that water has memory, but that it responds to sentiments – emotional states.  This Stuttgart study shows how each individual has a unique signature.  Would these persist if the same people were tested on a different occasion, I wonder?  I suspect the signatures would remain recognisable but would vary.  I suspect this because I think what the water is picking up is the emotional signature of each individual.

If water can do so, how about ether?  My theory is that it is nothing more or less than our own emotional states which create the familiar environment within the 3D matrix that surrounds us.  There is a ‘base state’ common to all (except, perhaps some of the individuals our scientists classify as mentally ill or disordered) which results from a mass psyche – the Zeitgeist and its resultant reality.  Overlaid on that is individual perception – the way the world appears to each of us, depending on the emotions prevalent within us.  Thus someone who feels that the world is a hostile, unfriendly place will create that reality for herself, while a person who expects disappointment will find situations and events which result from the ‘spin’ he has put upon his life experience.

Does this sound slightly familiar?  The Law of Attraction?  The Secret?  All that New Age stuff??  What, though, if it’s absolutely true: not in a metaphorical sense or as an analogy or parable?  What if this is actually the way creation on our planet works?

One final group of Giants to turn to for some help with this.  It does involve something of a dimensional shift, but I’m sure you’ll cope fine with that.  I’m turning now to those who have chosen not to reincarnate as humans and enter into this emotionally charged etheric hurly-burly.  These aspects of consciousness are the patient, loving beings who send channelled messages to us from beyond our 3D state.

Here is Seth, in Seth Speaks: The Eternal Validity of the Soul:

…you create your larger environment and the physical world as you know it by propelling your thoughts and emotions into matter – a breakthrough into three-dimensional life.  The inner self, therefore, individually and en masse, sends its psychic energy out, forming tentacles that coalesce into form.

Graphics, Wallpaper, The Background, Decoration, HintAnd just a few weeks back, Higgins gave us this:

Humans exist within a 3-D matrix. Envision the matrix as a three dimensional spider’s web stretching infinitely in all directions. This spider’s web is a literal highway for transportation. All that you see around you enters and exits your life via this matrix highway. This happens because you are a magnetic vortex. Your emotions create a magnetic field around you that simultaneously draws and repels life’s experiences.

So there it is: my theory, with backup from the Giants, on how matter is created.

We don’t need to be shown how to do it – we already ARE.  If we look around and love the world we’ve made for ourselves, we have no more to do.  If, on the other hand, there are aspects we are not happy with…  Well there’s no point in blaming others or fate or life.  We are all that.  We simply need to, as Will suggested, become ‘experienced and sufficiently enlightened’ to harness the energy and what we create.  Then, Tesla says,

…old worlds would vanish and new ones would spring into being.

 

 

 

Advertisements

17 comments on “Still with the Giants…

  1. Excellent post Janon! I do believe we create our own reality and as time passes it is becoming more and more apparent. More and more people are realizing coupled with the breakthroughs our scientists have been making!

  2. Beautiful thinking, Jan!

    “We simply need to, as Will suggested, become ‘experienced and sufficiently enlightened’ to harness the energy and what we create.”… without a dowsing rod or crystals (?) was my immediate question on reading your post, dear Jan, but then reason surfaced to add “..or maybe the dowsing rod and/or crystals lend their inherent properties to the task at hand thereby adding to what becomes possible, like how metal used in different ways makes machines out of scrap which then can be used to build other things so also crystals lend in their properties to what the human being can alrealdy do.” Makes sense, doesnt it? “Why waste a good thing?,” says the reasonable me.

    Thank you for sharing, Jan!

    • I agree completely with ‘reasonable you’!
      Tesla said: “It appears, then, possible for man through harnessed energy of the medium and suitable agencies for starting and stopping ether whirls to cause matter to form and disappear.”
      He doesn’t define those ‘suitable agencies’ and nor do I! However I suspect there are as many of them as our emotions and imaginations can create – certainly rods and crystals; doubtless sacred geometry and mathematics; quite probably the temples of the ancients and alchemy (Isaac Newton was obsessed with both!).

      Thank you so much, Bitha, for once again adding your eloquent thoughts to mine. My blog is enhanced so much by the thoughtful contributions made by you and others. ❤

      • I beg to slightly differ here. I seriously think it is the visible and the invisible creates and constitutes reality. I think there is the manifest and the unmanifest, pointing to matter and energy as the two dragons constantly trying to complete each other by becoming the other – the eternal love’ers – by constantly fluxing between the two states creating the ‘spin’ maybe or maybe the ‘spin’ is because of the string theory with the string being at the center as the actual ‘being’ – the eternal Nataraja of Hindu mythology – creating and maintaining all that there is by its constant dance, but whose dance is also guided by the material of the Universe to which is attached the ‘being’s’ strings.

      • I’ve read your comment here five or six times and I think (at this stage – more may come to me later) that the difference you perceive comes from how we define a ‘being’. I’m certainly not suggesting that a person holding a crystal or drawing a geometrical shape can create a table or a tulip, however strong their emotions!
        For me the ‘being’ that is you or I is multi-faceted and a holographic portion of All-That-Is.
        In what we see around us as our 3D reality, a tiny fragment of that being is manifest. By far the ‘greater’ portion (although I’m not of course talking in terms of mass) is unmanifest. It is pure consciousness. At that level, all must surely be energy. Only as we choose to incarnate on Earth do we require Matter.
        The matter we create – be it our environment, our possessions or our perception of the beings around us – is the sounding board against which we, through the vortex of our fluctuating emotions, constantly modify and recreate our Earthly experience. By that process the entirety of our being expands and grows, feeding into the Unity.

        I’ve probably strayed hopelessly from the points you were making. I confess I haven’t tried to incorporate string theory into my reasoning, as my understanding of it is too limited to be of use. I need to move further into my course before I can attempt that!

        Thank you, though. I will continue to muse on all of this.

      • Some strong points there, Jan. I also realize that the conscious mind is in continual attempt to comprehend the subconscious and unconscious (usually that of outside of oneself than the sub/unconscious of oneself) while at the same time the subconscious and unconscious of oneself have their own manifestations creating the reality each of us live. Please bear with me, I am not degressing even though I use different words; we are talking about the manifest and unmanifest afterall. I will leave it at this point though. I am contemplating taking the course too but not decided on it yet. I would probably speak with more semantic comprehensibility. Thanks to you, Synamex and Swetha, I am talking more by attempting to get my point across to you guys in the comments. I am now thinking of semantic comprehensibility – I guess I am making progress through ‘expressive aphasia.’

        I must admit though that I am a bit discombobulated at the moment. Some take-stock-of-your-life moments. My posts are having to take a backseat for a while since my clinical work is on centerstage right now, but will be back soon. I have some promises to honor – to you and Synamex – but I also have miles to go before I sleep, and I will manage the show for the show must go on and this is something that needs to be done. So long.

      • Then we will leave our musings here for now, in the certain knowledge that more will come to us which we feel compelled to share before too long 🙂 .

        Your reference to expressive aphasia shocked me, though. I hope it was an ironic reference, rather than a diagnosis some fool of an ‘expert’ has laid on you at some point… Certainly I have watched with delight as your posts and comments have blossomed with what appears to me a new-found eloquence and confidence, but I worked for many years with those diagnosed with speech and language difficulties/ the autistic spectrum (which overlapped but not entirely). I was on the education side. The medical side delighted in sending in specialists who would interview a child for 15 minutes and – if they were unable to see how the child’s mind was working – diagnose some disorder or the other. I watched those kids carefully and realised they had a grasp of concepts the experts would never comprehend. I therefore sat patiently and listened to the kids. One of them I’m still listening to – still learning from!
        Maybe that’s irrelevant. I kind of hope so, but just had to get it off my chest!

      • That is, again, very kind of you, Jan. That was a self-diagnosis from seeing more often that I thought very differently from a lot of people. What is obvious to me has not even occurred to most, and not comprehendible even if I point it out like to a child! I am having fun though trying on different labels like dresses to see which of the labels fit, and studying these labels through other resources, and sooo amused by how mislabelled a lot of these ‘diagnoses’ are – appalling actually. I don’t think 70% of the people on the planet are sick, just mislabelled and maltreated because of which they become patients. Very sad actually…and my 9-hour job is that of quality assurance in a medical transcription firm – frustrating but also a great eye opener/researching platform to the delight of the clinician in me. More invigored to continue the clinical work I do, for that means being able to DO something about that which I am frustrated about, which I think is a lott better than a lottt of people can claim to be able to do. Most people see ‘unfavorable’ things and are not in a position to DO anything about it.

        The ‘expressive aphasia’, whether mislabelled or not, has been around. People just don’t get what I say so then I sort of got into a difficulty of even getting my ideas out of my head – no body understands! – until to my great delight you and Synamex and Swetha could. And I guess I think complexly (I think about the Universe and multidimensions and reality vs illusion and the like as my daily tidbits. I wonder why people don’t discuss death on the breakfast table!.. I guess you get my point). It has been pure fun having the long comment chats. And I seriously think I am getting used to discussing my thoughts on this platform, and I am focusing now on semantic comprehensibility – talk about starting from the high end. Maybe in time I will make sense to the common Joe (fingers crossed).

        I think I may post sooner than I think, but I will just leave it to the sense of ‘needing expression’ for whenever that urge presents itself.

        Much love,
        Bitha

  3. Yes. I do believe this as well. From a Drunvalo Melchizekek workshop I took a year ago (AITH), when we create from a spot within our heart, that is the one point of singularity (the point of Unity), we will not have to create opposite of what we “want” (wanting indicates a feeling of lack- which brings us more lack because we are brought more of what we feel/ believe). During this workshop, we learned the mechanics of creating from our heart space. The image on this page shows how our heart energy ties into our body’s energy and also radiates out. http://www.stillandmovingcenter.com/tag/drunvalo-melchizedek/
    I’ve read from more than one source about how in order to create a physical body, our soul’s energy focuses and makes it so. When our earthly experience is over, that focus withdraws and the body is no longer needed (so it dies).
    In my own personal experience, as I’ve done healing work to uncover and change (heal) beliefs that weren’t helping me any longer, I’ve definitely noticed a change in what is created in my life. It’s so much better. And an offshoot of that is, I’m noticing positive changes in my family as well.
    Thank you for this brain candy of a post!

    • Keep creating, Sue! Sounds like you’re doing a great job ❤
      That image is gorgeous, by the way. Definitely massive power in the ring torus, and that's a double one!

      • Thanks Jan. Another thing that just came to mind was a talk I watched on Youtube by Daryl Anka (who channels Bashar), who talked about people who have multiple personalities who quite literally change eye color when they change personalities and another person who has diabetes when they are one of the personalities and has no trace of it when they are another. To me, this shows how powerfully our beliefs (conscious and not) affect what we create in our lives. The power and potential we possess is staggering.

  4. Pingback: Why Won’t magic Work For us? – The Snacking Sage

  5. Wonderful post Jan. That energy, vibration, as you already know is spoken of by so many throughout time. Joseph Campbell, the great mythologist, refers to it as the Aum vibration spoken of by the ancient yogis and meditation masters. Campbell says to experience this is the peak experience of all. John in the Bible calls it the Word. John:1 “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2He was with God in the beginning. 3Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. My teacher would call it the holy Nam. The Bible also says as a man thinketh so is he. We men, women, children, are creating all the time. Peace and Blessings

    • Thank you Craig, for your comments.
      Yes, as you say, we find it everywhere if we have the eyes to see. As one of my wisest teachers once said, ‘There are an infinite number of routes, but they all seem to lead to this one place.’
      Blessings to you and thanks for your constant inspiration.

  6. Pingback: Sense and Sensitivities | Looking at Life

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s