So where did it start, this little chain of perfect synchronicities?
I think a couple of weekends ago, when Will (my remote viewing partner) sent me a message. I was better able to understand his thoughts when I received this message on Facebook, the next day.
You see Will is an Aspie. He isn’t so bothered about making value judgements about how ‘good’ or ‘not good’ something is. He just likes to analyse the way it is. The way he had analysed our remote viewing experiences was, roughly, that since he wasn’t getting consistently perfect results and since many people were biased against such a non-mainstream way of viewing locations, it had disadvantages compared to using Google Earth or similar technology to view a remote location.
I couldn’t fault his logic. I couldn’t even put my finger on what made me feel rather sad about it. It was something like remote viewing feeling rather special and magical, and brilliant as GPS may be, it didn’t tick the same boxes for me.
I couldn’t deny that our viewings were rather mixed in quality. Sometimes they’ve been spot on, but often they were rather wide of the mark. Neither of us had been able to figure out what affected that. We’d tried a few theories but nothing had given him the accuracy he was seeking.
So there’s the trigger. Now for the synchronicities: (For anyone reading who isn’t sure what synchronicity is, it’s a state in which normal cause-and-effect is augmented by an extra layer of reality. It can appear like a series of bizarre coincidences, but there is a definite intelligence and consciousness embedded in it and organising it. The individual is led along a path towards a new level of understanding or an experience they have chosen at soul level to receive.)
A night or two after Will’s message, I decided to watch TV. I don’t often do that. There was a repeat of a programme about the mind of Einstein. I’d seen it before but I felt very drawn to watch it again.
A scientist was using impressive CGI to demonstrate how an object could only definitively be located if, in addition to the north-south, east-west and up-down co-ordinates, you added in TIME. That was because, she explained, objects are not always and forever in the same place.
I was impressed with that. It was a very clear and tidy explanation. I didn’t, at this point, link it to anything else. I just had a strong hunch that I didn’t need to watch any more of this programme. I found myself getting irrationally irritated by it and turned it off.
‘So what shall I do now?’ I asked myself and another strong hunch came along. I felt drawn to go to my computer.
There was nothing I needed to do on it. I’d already spent quite a while staring at the screen earlier in the day. I didn’t want to! I picked up my dinner plate and headed towards the kitchen, intending to do the washing up. As I opened the kitchen door, the hunch was almost screaming at me: ‘Go to the computer! You need to channel.’
Right. Okay. Got it.
Feeling bemused, but knowing it was right, I opened Word, typed in a message to my Guides saying I felt drawn to speak to them and asking if they had something to tell me. Then I picked up my crystal dowsing pendulum and waited for it to start swinging about over the keyboard, picking out the message I would receive. I barely use this method these days, but the pull to do it was too strong to ignore.
Within moments, we had connected and my guides were telling me they wanted to give me some information on how Will and I could improve our remote viewing.
The message came through incredibly clearly. They told me remote viewing was not a form of telepathy (that was one of the ideas we had recently been debating) and that when I tried to telepathically ‘send’ my location to him, I was inadvertently causing a fog around myself. I was to stop doing that and just focus on being where I was, leaving the ‘finding’ to Will.
Next, they told me Will hadn’t been using the time co-ordinate when he viewed me. Let’s say I planned to be in a specific location at 2pm. He would do the viewing at that time and I’d be in position. Sometimes, though, he picked up somewhere I’d been ten minutes before. That, my guides were explaining, was because he wasn’t specifically searching for me at the set time. If he focused on me AND the time, he’d get much more accurate viewings. I chatted through a few of our recent near misses and they were even able to tell me where Will had ‘seen’ me – usually in a place I’d looked at and passed on my way to the target. They pointed out that as long as he put in the time co-ordinate, he could do the viewing at any other time in his life – before or after the target event.
So time, like space, only exists within physical realms. It merely acts as a marker when you’re dealing with realms beyond our three – or rather four – dimensions.
Very excited, I sent a transcript of my channelled conversation to Will.
A couple of nights later I went to a lecture on psychic phenomena. The speaker told the story of an expert remote viewer who had done a ‘real time’ live viewing on TV – even seeing an oil tanker arrive on the scene while he was viewing it – but later confessed that he’d actually done the viewing the previous day, before the target destination had even been chosen!
Needless to say, I passed that information on to Will as well.
The following weekend he did a series of very accurate viewings of places I’d been earlier in the day. In each case I’d merely noted the time I was there and later asked him to focus on me at that time.
Today we did a ‘live’ viewing, but followed my guides’ advice. Once again, he got the clearest of viewings. For him the ‘dominant building’ – which he described extremely accurately – was the one I was beside at the given time. There were far larger structures nearby, but he saw them as fainter. In other words, he had located me (the object) in time and was able to pinpoint my position.
Will has revised his opinion of the usefulness of remote viewing in light of this new information. He’s been very satisfied with our recent results.
Me? I just love synchronicity!